Security To Be Added At Department of Labor Offices

February 28th, 2010

Security is being tightened at some state offices across Idaho. Local News 8 has learned security guards are being hired for some of the Department of Labor offices.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Inappropriate Conduct in the Workplace

February 27th, 2010

Employers are finally addressing the issue of hostile or uncomfortable work environments. Increased publicity about sexual harassment and discrimination at work has provided employers with the incentive needed to educate their staff about inappropriate work conduct. Although awareness is at an all-time high, there are still incidents that remain unreported, and, thereby, unaddressed.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Feds Probe Mass. chool That Used Shock Therapy

February 26th, 2010

The U.S. Justice Department has begun a review of whether the use of electric shock therapy by a Massachusetts special needs school violates the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Overcoming Summary Judgment in Sexual Harassment Cases

February 25th, 2010

The real difficulty in summary judgment is for plaintiffs who claim pervasive sexual harassment that has created a hostile and abusive work environment. There are two keys to overcoming summary judgment in this type of case. First, the plaintiff’s declaration must include a description of the offensive events over a significant period of time. We know, for example, that incidents occurring on one day are insufficient under the pervasive criterion. Second, the plaintiff’s declaration must demonstrate that the events are sexual in nature, or at least based on a bias against the plaintiff’s gender.

For example, while sexual harassment is generally based on sexual behavior and sexual speech, the case law supports claims for sexual harassment where a boss yells more vociferously and more forcefully at members of one sex in comparison to members of the other sex.

In summary, if a plaintiff can state the basic facts in support of a claim for quid pro quo harassment or for a claim of physical violence or a threat of violence in the nature of sexual molestation, that plaintiff should be able to overcome a motion for summary judgment without too much difficulty. On the other hand, nearly every plaintiff has to be careful in setting forth the details for claims of sexual harassment based on pervasive conduct.

For claims of pervasive harassment, the plaintiff should be prepared to demonstrate repeated acts of hostility that are based on the plaintiff’s sex, and that are supported by circumstances that show the offensive activities were unwanted.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

$7.5 M to laid-off Kansans

February 24th, 2010
More than 1,100 laid-off workers in south-central Kansas may soon get some help from a $7.5 million grant funded by federal stimulus money.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Staying Out of Trouble by Familiarizing Yourself With Wage Garnishment Information

February 23rd, 2010

There are few infuriating moments in a working man or woman’s life than to find that 15 to 25% of one’s disposable paycheck has been apportioned by court order in order to pay an outstanding debt. This debt can usually be dating back many years. As is expected, this can cause a tremendous amount of consternation and stress. It is therefore important, if one lives in a state where wage garnishment is legally permissible, to familiarise oneself with the process, especially if they owe back taxes or child support ( or both).Usually if you do owe, then a creditor can approach the courts and demand that your wages be withheld until the debt is satisfied.

Be in the know

While there is more than reason why one’s wages may be garnished, the predominant reasons are failing to pay income tax and child support. These are also the two that are easiest to default for reasons that are partially obvious. In the event that the IRS cannot find you, and you are declining to respond to the flurry of legal notices sent to the last known address they have on file, the final move is usually to secure a court order to nip part of your wages to pay off the debt. This may also include all the accrued interest and fees incurred by the government agency in filing with the courts. As dreadful as this practice is, it is not practiced in all the 50 states in the United States. Four states have voted to abstrain from using the practice. These are Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina. In these states, courts can still process lawsuits against debtors but the creditor is not authorized to touch a debtor’s wages.

Legal Issues

As inconveniencing as garnishment is, it is tightly regulated by laws. Creditors cannot simply commence on garnishment procedures arbitrarily. They must first prove to the courts that there was an honest attempt to collect the debt using peaceful non-threatening ways. They must also show that they attempted to contact the debtor but without much success or that the debtor was deliberately evading paying the debt. It is after this that the court can order one’s wages to be garnished.

Debts affected

The two most common reasons why people find their wages being garnished is failure to pay income tax and child support. These however are not the only reason why garnishment can be conducted. A creditor doing business in a state that authorizes garnishment can commence with the procedure for practically any debt. Personal loans can also trigger garnishment if they remain unpaid for a considerable amount of time.

Free Wage-Garnishment Help

Pick up your FREE guide to how to stop wage garnishment and reclaim your financial independence today!

Stop Wage Garnishment immediately.

Article Source:

http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Jimmy_Jamm

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Colleague’s claim that Dr. Amy Bishop was ‘crazy’ may have led to EEOC complaint

February 22nd, 2010
A male colleague’s statement that Dr. Amy Bishop was “crazy” may have led to a gender bias complaint she filed against the University of Alabama in Huntsville last fall with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Exercising Presidential Protected Rights Invites Litigant Retaliation

February 21st, 2010

Individuals, throughout respective lifetimes, encounter challenges requiring one speaking out or correcting existing dilemmas. In addition individuals use respective rights such as Constitutional, protective, Title VII, or inherited GOD given rights, which enable individuals towards developing an improved environment through usage of such rights. For instance, the Constitution, written by our forefathers, brought light towards many freedoms, given speech, religion, expression, and many other rights, for which The United States of America became developed. Hence, “One nation under GOD” was developed allowing towards inheriting GOD’s given rights.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Advisory Council supports changes to unemployment tax system

February 20th, 2010
19, 2010 Media Contact: Dawn Dovre, 605-773-3094 Advisory Council supports changes to unemployment tax system PIERRE , S.D. The Unemployment Insurance Advisory Council has unanimously voted in favor of SB186 after council discussion, questions and public testimony.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

Employee Rights in the Workplace

February 19th, 2010

Employee Rights and Duties go hand in hand. If employees have to discharge their duties and responsibilities effectively, they must also be given their due rights. The rights of the employees give them a sense of confidence and a feeling of belonging to the workplace. It is a way in which the employer can provide security to the employees in return for their commitment at the workplace. The employee rights guarantees them from discrimination or other unethical and illegal practices at the workplace.

Read more

Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »

« Previous Entries