Legal Landmines - 2009 Law Changes Could Impact Your Business
November 30th, 2009Employee lawsuits are distracting, expensive, and mostly avoidable. Jury Verdicts Research 2007 edition of “Employment Practices Liability, Jury Award Trends, and Statistics” highlights some employment statistics and trends that you should know:
Employee lawsuits have risen 400% in the past 20 years to the currently level of 6.5 claims per 1,000 employees annually
- The most common targets for Federal discrimination claims are private employers with between 15 and 100 employees (41.5%); second are private companies with an excess of 500 employees (23.9%); and third are private companies with between 100 and 500 employees (18%)
- In any employment case filed in federal court, there is a 16% chance the award will exceed $1 million and a 67% chance that the award will exceed $100,000; attorney fees are not included
- The average compensatory award in all federal court employment cases was $493,534 and reflects a 45% increase since 2000; a compensatory award does not include punitive damages or attorney fees
- In State courts, compensatory awards are up 39% while wrongful termination claims are up 260%
- If an employment lawsuit goes to trial, plaintiffs are more likely to win 67% of cases in State court and 63% in federal court
- The cost to settle an employment lawsuit has grown significantly over the last 5 years, from an average of $130,476 in 2001 to $310,845 in 2006
These general statistics are sobering and are cause for concern to ALL organizations. Compounding these are recent changes in Federal and State laws that affect almost all organizations. In a litigious employment environment that seems to increasingly favor employees, risk-minimizing organizations MUST understand the recent changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) regulations. Employers should take immediate steps to assure they are in compliance with new laws to protect themselves from future liability.
What Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 2009 Changes do I Need to Understand?
The ADA requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide qualified individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from employment-related opportunities. It prohibits discrimination in recruitment, hiring, promotions, training, pay, social activities, and other privileges of employment. It further requires employers to make reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of otherwise qualified individuals with disabilities, unless it results in undue hardship to the employer.
The ADA Amendments, effective January 1, 2009, overturns prior Supreme Court decisions and makes clear that the ADA is intended to provide a broad scope of protection for employees. In general, it expands existing definitions to more employees. For many employers, existing policies and procedures may no longer be valid or useful in determining HR practices.
Specific 2009 ADA changes:
- Organizations cannot consider mitigating measures such as medications or other measures that treat a disease when determining if an individual has a disability.
- Broadens the definition of disability by adding to what may affect a major life activity, and now includes major bodily functions, such as functions of the immune system, normal cell growth, digestive, bowel, bladder, neurological, brain, respiratory, circulatory, endocrine, and reproductive functions.
- Clarifies that an impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if it substantially limits a major life activity when active.
- Clarifies that one of the definitions of disability - “being regarded as having impairment” - doesn’t require the impairment to actually limit a major life activity.
What Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) 2009 Changes do I Need to Understand?
The FMLA provides leave entitlement to eligible employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job protected leave, per 12-month period for employers who employ 50 or more employees. Leave may be taken for birth or placement for adoption or foster care of a child; the serious health condition of the employee’s spouse, son, daughter, or parent; or the serious health condition of the employee that makes the employee unable to perform the functions of the employee’s job.
The new regulations, effective January 16, 2009, have created new categories of leave-military caregiver leave and qualifying exigency leave, and has revised and clarified existing regulations. Especially for organizations with active duty or reserve duty military personnel, or with families of active duty or reserve duty military, these changes require modifications to leave procedures/forms, training/communications, and policies, current HR practices related to employee leave.
Specific 2009 FMLA changes:
- Provides military caregiver leave, which permits an employee who is a spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next of kin of a service member with a serious injury or illness to take a combined total of 26 workweeks of unpaid leave during a single 12-month period.
- Provides qualifying exigency leave, which permits an eligible employee to take protected, unpaid leave for a period up to 12 workweeks for the employee’s spouse, child, or parent who is on active duty or called to active duty in support of a contingency operation. This leave includes short notice deployment, military events and related activities, childcare and school activities for those incapable of self-care, making or updating financial and legal arrangements, spending time with covered military member of short-term, temporary rest and recuperation leave during deployment, post-deployment activities and other activities that arise out of a covered military member’s active duty or call to active duty.
- Gives employers 5 days to provide an Eligibility Notice following employee’s request for FMLA leave or knowledge that an employee’s leave may be FMLA qualifying.
- Changes time requirements and procedures for medical certifications.
- Specifies that light duty work does not count against FMLA leave allotment.
- Clarifies that the employee is required to explain the reasons for requesting leave if the employee cannot give 30-day advance notice of need for leave.
- Clarifies when an employer may require a fitness-for-duty certification.
- Allows employers to delay or deny FMLA leave to an employee who unjustifiably fails to comply with employer’s notice and procedural requirements for requesting leave.
- Requires the employee to provide notice of need for qualifying exigency leave as soon as practicable, regardless of how far in advance such leave is foreseeable.
What Other Changes do I Need to Understand?
- In addition to the ADA and FMLA changes, other laws and changes may require modifications to existing policies, procedures, and HR practices.
- Effective January 1, 2009, in order to have independent contractor status, one must obtain an Independent Contractor Exemption Certificate from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. Employers in some industries will be required to pay workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance and other benefits to anyone without a Certificate.
- Effective February 2, 2009, all employers will be required to use a new I-9 form;
- Effective November 2009, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 will protect Americans from being treated unfairly by employers and health insurers because of differences in their DNA that may affect their heath.
- Effective January 1, 2008 employers are required to give employees notice of their rights and remedies available under the Personnel Records Statute.
- The Minnesota Supreme Court in 2008 clarified that Minnesota’s wage statute requires employers to pay vacation pay to departing employees only if there is a promise to pay. There is no longer an automatic right to accrued vacation pay when employment terminates.
Are your documented policies, procedures, and practices aligned with all of the 2009 changes?
What Should Employers Do?
Given the many changes, employers must act quickly to align policies, procedures, and practices with these changes. At a minimum, all Minnesota employers should conduct a thorough review of recruitment, selection, training, promotion, performance evaluation, and HRIS systems to ensure compliance. All employee and managers handbooks, forms, website information and more must be aligned with these changes.
What Policy Changes Should We Implement?
- Review and revise all policies to reflect changes in the ADA, FMLA, and other laws.
What Procedures/Forms Changes Should We implement?
- Ensure your organization’s procedures and forms reflect the recent changes
- Establish procedures for responding to requests for ADA accommodations
- Revise FMLA Notice forms. Notice forms are available on Department of Labor’s website: http://www.dol.gov/whd/index.htm
- Revise medical certification forms to remove the request for type of leave and to allow for additional information needed
- Revise employee handbook and policies regarding FMLA leave; set forth specific procedures for employees to report leave
What Practice Changes Should We Implement?
- Train managers how to determine when reasonable accommodations may be necessary
- Document all interactive discussions and decisions on ADA accommodations
- Train managers to handle situations that might be related to a disability, in particular, where employees believe they are regarded as disabled
- Prepare job descriptions for each position which provide essential job functions including the minimum physical requirements to perform each EJF including fitness-for-duty certifications
- Train managers on new military leaves and other changes to regulations
- Keep track of the dates of notice and FMLA leave use
- Ensure your managers have the right training to recognize problem situations and follow existing procedures
- Vigorously investigate all notices of concern
- Document each step of the FMLA process AND all employee interactions that may fall under ADA or FMLA laws
What Else Can We Do?
For many organizations, the next step is to seek professional assistance. A consulting firm that is knowledgeable in employment law can help identify how to cut your overall program costs while dramatically improving outcomes.
|
Mary Gorski has more than 15 years of corporate human resource management and assessment experience. She has worked with many levels of leadership and understands the needs of a well-run, efficient business. At the same time she understands the human factor and what motivates people to maximum performance and efficiency. Her company, MG Assessments is currently partnering with Mansfield Tanick & Cohen an established, respected law firm, representing businesses, organizations and individuals throughout the U.S. and globally in a diverse array of practice areas. MG Assessments specializes in Human Resource Consulting, Sales Force Selection, Hiring Assessments, 360 Performance management and Employee Engagement. Article Source: |
|
Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
Annual report of the Department of Labor and Industry of the state of Virginia
November 29th, 2009Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
Underpaid and Undervalued? You Need Employment Law Solicitors
November 28th, 2009We live in a work-obsessed culture and put work before anything else, even our families. However, it seems more people are being underpaid and undervalued in their line of work, thus resulting in individuals seeking advice from trained employment law solicitors.
If you don’t know your rights then it is hard to know if your employer is doing the right thing or not. Employment law solicitors will be able to advise you where you stand and if anything can be done to ease the situation.
Underpaid - if you’ve been working for an employer for a number of years and never had a pay increase, or if you have been putting in numerous hours of overtime and never see a dime, then your employer could be breaking the law. Too many employers think it is okay to treat workers poorly and it seems that more workers are falling victim to this with the recession in full swing. Employers feel that they have a much stronger hold over their workers as work is in short supply in the big wide world, so some employers think they are doing their staff a favour by just keeping them in a job, and they don’t see the need to pay overtime etc.
Undervalued - some workers feel very undervalued when they are at work. They could be stuck doing menial jobs, despite the fact they have good qualifications and are used to doing something much better. Some employers treat workers with very little respect which results in staff seeking advice from employment law solicitors. It is a sad situation when people are undervalued in today’s society, especially with the long hours and hard work people put in.
So, if any of the above sounds like something you might have experienced, its time you spoke with employment law solicitors. They will get you the justice you deserve. Don’t assume that nothing can be done because it has gone on for so long - there has never been a better time to seek advice from specialists.
Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
Unemployment benefits being extended for some in Vermont
November 27th, 2009Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
What to Do If You Are Injured at Work
November 26th, 2009In recent years, Iowa has become one of the states with the highest injury rates for employees. For this reason, a Des Moines workers comp lawyer is not hard to come by. In fact, a Des Moines workers comp attorney is very good at getting employees the money they are entitled to after they have been injured while on the job. To make things easier, it is important for people to know what exactly they should do when they are seriously injured at work. Below, is a list of the steps that should be followed after a serious injury at the workplace:
1. Call an ambulance, assuming you are able. (If you are not able, it can be assumed that someone will call an ambulance for you). For example, if you break a bone while on the job, you should call 911 and get to a hospital as quickly as possible.
2. Assuming you are able, contact your boss or supervisor as soon as possible. You should tell them exactly what happened so they understand the situation. Again, if you are unconscious or otherwise unable to contact your boss, it can be assumed that a coworker or family member would do this for you.
3. Once you are released from the hospital, you should make sure you have appropriate paperwork from the hospital to be able to give to your boss or someone from human resources.
4. Before meeting with human resources about compensation, you should read over the company literature about injuries that occur during the job. If you feel it is necessary, you may want to consider hiring a representative from a law firm or private practice to come with you to your meeting with your human resources contact. You are entitled to have representation there if you feel the need to have someone with you during your meeting, although it is not required. Hiring representation depends on the type of injury and each individual company’s policy on employee injuries.
5. Meet with the human resources contact. You should go into the meeting knowing whether or not your injury was caused by the negligence of the company rather than your own personal negligence. If you caused your injury, then you probably will not be entitled to any kind of compensation. For example, if company equipment breaks and you break your arm because of it, you will most likely be entitled to some money from the company. However, if you are using a tool inappropriately and you break your arm, then you will probably not receive any kind of compensation. You need to be able to answer any questions about the injury as honestly as possible.
It is important to remember that you are entitled to representation at your meeting with your human resources person and you should be knowledgeable about the company’s policies. Hopefully, if you are ever injured on the job through the company’s negligence you will be able to get the money that you are entitled to without much hassle.
|
Connor R. Sullivan recently reviewed the work of a Des Moines workers comp lawyer to review the effectiveness of their work. He hired a Des Moines workers comp attorney to provide legal assistance for a workman’s compensation claim. Article Source: |
|
Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
New Jobless Claims Hit Lowest Level In A Year
November 25th, 2009Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
Unprofessionalism at Work
November 24th, 2009Unprofessionalism is more than just mediocre productivity or being naïve of a certain skill. It is any behavior that will hinder productivity and/or relationships in the workplace. Unprofessionalism can be dishonesty, corruption, carelessness, disrespectfulness, hostility, greed, impatience, irresponsibility, laziness, pride, rudeness, or self gratification.
Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
State mulls paid sick leave bill
November 23rd, 2009Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
Sarah Palin’s $50,000 Background Check
November 22nd, 2009Background Check for $50,000!
$50,000 is a large sum of money. You can buy a number of things with that kind of cash: cars, down payment on a condo, even live off of that kind of dough. But would you pay $50,000 for a background check to become Senator John McCain’s running mate in the 2008 presidential election? Apparently, the Republican Party Committee thinks so because according to Sarah Palin they are asking her to pay $500,000 in vetting expenses which include a $50,000 for a background screening.
According to her new memoir “Going Rouge” Sarah Palin said that she was asked to pay for the expenses incurred for being able to run as Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential election running mate. The $50,000 was only part of the lump sum of $500,000 billed to Sarah Palin. According to Palin, expenses were going to be paid if Sen. John McCain one the election but she was never told that they would charge her if they didn’t win.
Most employers include background checks in their screening process but almost always paid by the employer. This seems only fair that the employer pay for potential employees. If an employer wants to hire someone for a position but is concerned about any criminal offenses that the candidate may have committed the responsibility falls upon the employer and not the employee to pull up criminal record information. Which means any expenses incurred from any records should be paid by the employer.
Secondly, what kind of background check costs $50,000? The average background check costs around $20 - $100 but for $50,000 it must have had information about every single family member, acquaintance, relationship and meal Sarah Palin ate for the past decade in it.
Even if you are vetting for presidential candidacy you shouldn’t be treated differently from the standard business practices. Unfortunately, for Sarah Palin the Republic Party committee fully disagrees.
Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »
United States: Equal Employment Opportunity Workplace Poster Updated By The EEOC - Barnes & Thornburg
November 21st, 2009Posted in Employment Law Cases | No Comments »